University Rankings 2015: Methodology

Maclean’s places universities in one of three categories, recognizing the differences in types of institutions, levels of research funding, diversity of offerings, and breadth and depth of graduate and professional programs. Primarily Undergraduate universities tend to be smaller in size and have fewer graduate programs and graduate students. Those in the Comprehensive category have a significant degree of research activity and a wide range of programs at the undergraduate and graduate levels, including professional degrees. Medical Doctoral universities offer a broad range of Ph.D. programs and research; all universities in this category have medical schools.

In each category, Maclean’s ranks the institutions in six broad areas based on 12 performance indicators, allocating a weight to each indicator. Figures include data from all federated and affiliated institutions. The magazine does not rank schools with fewer than 1,000 full-time students, those that are restrictive due to a religious or specialized mission, newly designated universities or those that are not members of the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada (AUCC).

The rankings are based on the most recent and publicly available data. Statistics Canada provides student numbers, as well as data for total research income and five financial indicators: operating budget; spending on student services; scholarships and bursaries; library expenses and acquisitions. Financial figures are for fiscal year 2012-13; student numbers are for 2011. In recent years, Maclean’s obtained faculty numbers from Statistics Canada as well, but since Statistics Canada no longer collects these data, 2012 faculty numbers were obtained directly from the universities. Data for the social sciences and humanities research grants indicator and the medical-science research grants indicator are for fiscal year 2013-14 and were obtained directly from the three major federal granting agencies: the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). In addition, Maclean’s collects information on dozens of student and faculty awards from 48 agencies and sends more than 7,500 reputational surveys to university officials at each ranked institution, high school guidance counsellors, CEOs, recruiters and the heads of a wide variety of national and regional organizations.

Maclean’s weights the rankings as follows:

STUDENTS AND CLASSES (20 per cent of final score) Maclean’s collects data on the success of students at winning national academic awards (weighted 10 per cent) over the previous five years. The list encompasses more than 16,800 individual awards. The count includes such prestigious awards as the Rhodes scholarships and the Fulbright awards, as well as scholarships from professional associations and the three federal granting agencies. Each university’s total of student awards is divided by its number of full-time students, yielding a per-student count.

To gauge students’ access to professors, Maclean’s measures the number of full-time-equivalent students per full-time faculty member (10 per cent). This student-faculty ratio includes graduate as well as undergraduate students.

FACULTY (20 per cent) In assessing the calibre of faculty, Maclean’s calculates the number who have won major national awards over the past five years, including the distinguished Killam, Molson and Steacie prizes, the Royal Society of Canada awards, the 3M Teaching Fellowships and nearly 40 other award programs covering a total of 865 individual awards (eight per cent). To scale for institution size, the award count for each university is divided by each school’s number of full-time faculty.

In addition, the magazine measures the success of faculty in securing research grants from SSHRC, NSERC and CIHR. Maclean’s takes into account both the number and the dollar value received in the previous year, and divides the totals by each institution’s full-time faculty count. Research grants are reported by how many are awarded to the primary investigator on a project. Social sciences and humanities grants (six per cent) and medical-science grants (six per cent) are tallied as separate indicators.

RESOURCES (12 per cent) This section examines the amount of money available for current expenses per full-time-equivalent student (six per cent). Students are weighted according to their level of study—bachelor, master’s or doctorate—and their program of study.

To broaden the scope of the research picture, Maclean’s also measures total research dollars (six per cent). This figure, calculated relative to the size of each institution’s full-time faculty, includes income from sponsored research, such as grants and contracts, federal, provincial and foreign government funding, and funding from non-governmental organizations.

STUDENT SUPPORT (13 per cent) To evaluate the assistance available to students, Maclean’s examines the percentage of the budget spent on student services (6.5 per cent) as well as scholarships and bursaries (6.5 per cent). Expenditures are measured as they are reported to the Canadian Association of University Business Officers.

LIBRARY (15 per cent) Maclean’s measures the percentage of a university’s operating budget allocated to library services (10 per cent) and the percentage of the library budget spent on acquisitions (five per cent). Both indicators capture spending on electronic resources. Maclean’s made a change to the library section this year and eliminated two indicators—library holdings per student and total library holdings. With the shift to electronic access, sheer number of volumes is no longer relevant. As of 2013, the Canadian Association of Research Libraries—Maclean’s source for these data in recent years—no longer requests these data from its members. The five per cent weight previously allocated to these indicators has been redistributed to the library expenses indicator.

REPUTATION (20 per cent) This section reflects a university’s reputation in the community at large. For the reputational survey,  Maclean’s solicits the views of those whose professions put them in a position to form opinions about how well universities are meeting the needs of students and how ready their graduates are to embark on successful careers. Surveys are sent to university officials at each ranked institution, high school guidance counsellors from every province and territory, the heads of a wide variety of national and regional organizations, and CEOs and recruiters. Respondents are asked to rate Canada’s universities in three categories: Highest Quality, Most Innovative, and Leaders of Tomorrow. Best Overall represents the sum of the scores for all three categories. The reputational survey has a regional as well as a national component that divides the country into four key areas: the Western provinces, Ontario, Quebec and the Atlantic provinces. All respondents completed a national survey; university officials and guidance counsellors also completed regional ones, allowing them the opportunity to focus on the region they know best. The surveys are combined to produce the final results.

More than 7,500 surveys were sent out in 2014, achieving an overall response rate of 9.3 per cent. Broken out by groups, the response rates were: 30.5 per cent for university officials; 5.1 per cent for high school guidance counsellors; 5.3 per cent for CEOs, corporate recruiters and heads of organizations.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional data are obtained directly from universities or from university websites, as well as from Common University Data Ontario and Atlantic Common University Data Set. These figures are not used in the rankings calculations, as not all universities make this information available.

As a measure of student quality, Maclean’s presents incoming students’ average high school grades. The figures are for full-time students attending university in their home province. No conversion formula is applied to incoming grade averages to adjust for provincial differences or varying admission policies, although CÉGEP grades are converted to a percentage grade. To provide a more detailed picture of grade averages, Maclean’s displays grades divided into six grade ranges, extending from less than 70 per cent to 95 per cent and higher.

Maclean’s counts the proportion of out-of-province students and international students in the first-year undergraduate class, as well as the percentage of international graduate students for schools in the Medical Doctoral and Comprehensive categories.

In taking stock of retention rates, Maclean’s asks for the percentage of full-time, first-year students who return in second year. While many factors can affect a student’s choice not to return—personal considerations or a decision to transfer to a program unavailable at his or her home university— student retention, on the whole, reflects a university’s success in keeping its students on course. Maclean’s also measures graduation rates by tracking an incoming cohort of full-time, first-year undergraduate students to determine if they received a degree within seven years.

In assessing faculty, Maclean’s counts the percentage of full-time instructional faculty members who have a Ph.D., a first professional degree or a terminal degree (other highest-level degree) in their field.

Finally, in looking at the classroom experience, Maclean’s presents figures on average undergraduate class sizes at the first- and second-year level, as well as at the third- and fourth-year level.

 

To see more from our 2015 university rankings issue, visit www.macleans.ca/rankings