High court strikes down Bill 104
This is not the unequivocal decision opponents of Bill 104 had hoped for. Far from sweeping aside the rationale for the law—which sought to close a loophole allowing greater access to English-language schooling—the Supreme Court of Canada has merely declared the legislation an "excessive" response to the problem. But the decision, written by Justice Louis LeBel, explicitly recognizes "the problem" as the Quebec government sees it, namely, the potential proliferation of privately funded English schools that would erode the primacy of French in the province. The Quebec National Assembly now has a year to amend its law before the SCC decision takes effect, which reduces the likelihood the Charest government will invoke the notwithstanding clause of the Constitution to protect Bill 104.
Get the Best of Maclean’s straight to your inbox.
Sign up for news, commentary and analysis. Join 60,000+ Canadian readers.