/
1x
Advertisement

True North Strong Free. Subscribe today.

Mandatory sentences are always a bad idea except when they’re a good one

Justice Minister Rob Nicholson backs a crime bill he once opposed
Add Maclean's(opens in a new tab)

A lot can change in 22 years. Take Federal Justice Minister Rob Nicholson’s opinion about drug laws, for example. Today, he’s pushing to pass a crime bill that includes mandatory minimum sentences for drug crimes. Among other other measures, anyone found with five or more marijuana plants would have to serve a minimum of six months in prison. In 1988, however, Nicholson took up arms against the very same proposition. While serving as a Mulroney backbencher, Nicholson was vice-chair of a parliamentary committee that examined mandatory minimum sentences. In a report titled "Taking Responsibility," the committee argued against that very type of sentencing, insisting such guidelines "have had the undesirable effect of contributing to rapidly increasing prison populations in the United States." A spokesperson for Nicholson explained the change of heart by citing the government’s firm belief that "for certain offences [...] a minimum period of incarceration is justified."

The Hill Times

Get the Best of Maclean’s straight to your inbox.

Sign up for news, commentary and analysis. Join 60,000+ Canadian readers.

By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.