education research

The graduate’s million-dollar promise

A university degree was once a guarantee of higher incomes. Those days are gone, argue two profs

The office petri dish

Why so many researchers and academics are turning their attention to the modern workplace

no-image

If you’re an aural learner, read this aloud to yourself

The actual “scientific” literature on learning styles is virtually nonexistent

no-image

If you’re an aural learner, read this aloud to yourself

A new study in the APS journal Psychological Science in the Public Interest [PDF] inquires into the scientific basis for one of the most influential fashions in current pedagogy: the idea that different students have different kinds of optimal “learning styles”. The number of “learning style” taxonomies being peddled by various authors and theorists is in the dozens. It’s a lucrative business, as Pashler et al. point out, and it has gotten a firm toehold in the public schools and education textbooks (and, he might have added, in homeschooling literature). One of the most popular theories is the “VARK” schema, which sorts the human species into visual, aural, “read/write”, and kinesthetic learners.