Andrew Davis

no-image

Competition and school choice

I try to avoid shamelessly passing along links without any commentary; today you’ll have to suffer the indignity of such a post.

no-image

How much does your professor earn?

If your institution is in Ontario, you might be able to find out

no-image

Student loan debt: it’s still a good thing

Is education a right or an investment? The debate continues here

no-image

Student loan debt: it’s a good thing

Billions owed to the government proves many people benefit from student loans

no-image

On the cultivation of lawyers

Good or bad? Right or wrong? Just different?

no-image

The five-decade challenge

Okay, a brief review of British education. Unlike North America, students across the country (countries, really) write standardized exams. These have been awarded a bunch of different names over the years (O-levels and A-levels versus various certificates), but the crux of the matter is that students typically write one set of exams (ordinary levels) at the end of grade 11 and have been doing so since the 1950s. Passing these exams is not typically considered preparation for university, which would generally require advanced levels.

no-image

Incentives for benevolence

Like any business, private universities rely on keeping their customers happy

no-image

Print edition article

As some of you may have noticed by now, I have a short piece in the university edition of Maclean’s. If you want to comment or ask questions, this is the space.

no-image

No free lunches, tuition fees edition

Everything comes at a price, monetary or not

no-image

Read this now: a professor’s lament

A professor of an unnamed liberal arts discipline explains his decision to leave academia.

no-image

Opportunities for signalling

I couldn’t help but chuckle when this event popped up on my facebook. I realize some of you may not be indocrinated, so I’ll post the concise summary here:

no-image

Universities respond to incentives

Baylor University is being called “the poster child for SAT misuse” after the student newspaper revealed an unusual practice: paying admitted freshmen to retake the SAT and offering large financial rewards for those whose scores go up by certain levels.While the university says that its approach is designed to give out more scholarship aid, it is being denounced as a cynical attempt to boost SAT averages (which dropped for the class in which this approach is being used) to try to improve the university’s standing with U.S. News & World Report.