Trump’s steel tariff draws global backlash: ’Just straight up stupid’

Trump’s vow to slap huge tariffs on steel and aluminum imports sparked an uproar from businesses, world leaders and economists the world over
Dow Plunges Over 400 Points On News Of New Steel And Aluminum Tariffs
NEW YORK, NY - MARCH 1: A trader is comforted by a coworker as they work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on March 1, 2018 in New York City. Major stock indexes plunged Thursday afternoon following President Trump’s announcement that he was imposing a 25 percent tariff on imported steel and 10 percent on aluminum. Investor concern about the news rattled the Dow Jones industrial average, which closed down more than 400 points. (Photo by Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/Getty Images)

Donald Trump fancies himself a master dealmaker who can get his opponents off their game by employing aggressive and unpredictable negotiating tactics. It’s not clear, however, that the U.S. President’s latest surprise protectionist move was designed to get the kind of reception it has received.

Thursday’s move, signalling his intention to impose a 25 percent levy on all steel imports and 10 percent on aluminum, created shock waves of concern across the globe from politicians, businesses, trade groups, financial markets and from the ranks of his own Republican party. At stake? The risk of higher prices for consumers, pain for manufacturers worldwide, stock market selloffs and a global trade war.


First, it started with the Trump tweets:

“When a country (USA) is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good, and easy to win.”

“Example, when we are down $100 billion with a certain country and they get cute, don’t trade anymore-we win big. It’s easy!”

“We must protect our country and our workers. Our steel industry is in bad shape. IF YOU DON’T HAVE STEEL, YOU DON’T HAVE A COUNTRY!”

Then came the reaction:

“Longer term, tariffs on steel and aluminum could signal a marked deterioration in global trade relations to the extent that they are followed by other measures from the U.S. and potential responses from other countries.” -Moody’s Investors Service Managing Director Marie Diron, who warned Canada, the top foreign source of U.S. imported steel, would be the hardest hit.

“Should restrictions be imposed on Canadian steel and aluminum products, Canada will take responsive measures to defend its trade interests and workers.” – Canadian foreign minister Chrystia Freeland

“We are putting it on hold. We believe that tariffs could cause a pretty significant increase in the price of steel on the U.S. market.” – Electrolux spokesman Daniel Frykholm on the Swedish appliance maker’s decision to delay a planned $250-million investment in Tennessee, pending Trump’s plan

This is just straight up stupid. This is fundamentally incompetent, corrupt or misguided.”  “The biggest thing is they think this is going to scare the Chinese. This isn’t going to scare anybody. This is going to scare markets, but it’s not going to scare the Chinese government, it’s going to lead to retaliation possibly. And that’s where things get bad.” – Adam Posen, president of the Peterson Institution for International Economics in the U.S.

“If the United States goes down this path for steel and aluminum, there is little to prevent other countries from arguing that they too are justified to use similar exceptions to halt U.S. exports of completely different products.” “Because this leads to a downward spiral and erodes meaningful obligations under international trade rules, justifying import restrictions based on national security is really the ‘nuclear option.’ ” – Chad P. Bown of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a Washington-based think tank

“Leaving aside the fact that the Pentagon has already come out against these tariffs —ironically on national security grounds— guess who are our biggest suppliers of steel and aluminium? Europe and Canada, respectively.That is so hard to believe that it borders on absurd.”

“In plain language, these tariffs are a terrible idea. In fact, it is such a terrible idea that there was talk amongst the GOP [Republican Party] today about pulling some of the President’s unilateral trade authority.” – Tom Porcelli, US chief economist with RBC

“We will not sit idly while our industry is hit with unfair measures that put thousands of European jobs at risk.” – European Commission head Jean-Claude Juncker

Manufacturers “will be paying higher prices for our stainless steel going forward, ironically making us less competitive against foreign-finished goods.” – Greg Owens, the president of U.S. flatware maker Sherrill Manufacturing

“This whole issue can blow up the [World Trade Organization]. This is not about national security. This is about propping up a U.S. industry that isn’t viable.” – Axel Eggert, the European Steel Association’s director general

“If all countries followed the example of the United States, [it] will undoubtedly result in a serious impact on the international trade order.” – Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson

“Such tariffs will severely impact our steel and aluminum industry.” – Steffen Seibert, German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s chief spokesman

“The administration’s decision to impose substantial steel and aluminium tariffs will adversely impact automakers, the automotive supplier community and consumers.” – Toyota spokesperson

“Every time you do this, you get a retaliation, and agriculture is the number one target. I think this is terribly counterproductive.” – Senator Pat Roberts, a Kansas Republican

“It is a real worry because Europe is an open global economy so it isn’t just about U.S. versus China. And we will see retaliation, there are no two ways about it.” – Ian Ormiston, European equity fund manager at Old Mutual Global Investors