national securities regulator
Will a national securities regulator really help Canadian investors?
More works needs to be done before investors can celebrate the creation of a single regulator
Five things that will shape Canada’s economy in 2014
The country’s fragile recovery extends into 2014
What’s the big deal about the new securities regulator, anyway?
Stephen Gordon explains
Securities Reference: the power of one
There’s no good reason to believe a single regulator is better than two, or three, or ten
The national securities regulator and judicial Stockholm Syndrome
Why the Court’s adherence to a 19th-century precedent is too rigid and cautious
This Court doesn’t lean
Paul Wells on why Maurice Duplessis’s old saw about the Supreme Court being like the Tower of Pisa no longer applies
On the Supreme Court rejecting a national securities regulator
The court doesn’t doubt that valid reasons for national securities regulation exist. But that’s not the point.
B.C. rethinks securities regulator case
Flaherty could lose key ally in constitutional battle with provinces
Maxime Bernier Chessmaster Watch
The maverick backbencher manages the neat trick of stating his opposition to the government’s plans for a national securities regulator, while preemptively blaming the Quebec government if such a thing is allowed to proceed by the Supreme Court.
Maybe not the whole nine yards, but a few
ANDREW COYNE on the Speech from the Throne
Pan-Canadian, except for that gaping hole in the middle
Oh, that national securities regulator? Seems it depends which “nation” you’re talking about. La Presse reports (via Norm Spector):
Megapundit: Concentrating the mind, wonderfully
Must-reads: Jeffrey Simpson on Michael Ignatieff.